The Sun Belt Conference added Texas State on Wednesday, giving the league 10 football-playing members with the addition of Georgia State last month. Florida International and North Texas are reportedly leaving the conference for Conference USA.
Comments from commissioner Karl Benson below:
Karl Benson
“The press conference that they had on campus today was tremendous. There was media from San Antonio, San Marcos and Austin. Truly a very, very successful launch as we announced Texas State. We believe that these two additions – Georgia State and Texas State – with the emerging universities with strong presidential leadership, football programs that are on the rise and expecting to pursue the FBS and to get to the FBS will be great additions to the Sun Belt Conference.”
Replacing FIU, UNT: “The addition of Georgia State and Texas State is part of a plan and a strategy that the Sun Belt has in place to bring in quality universities. Not only to allow the Sun Belt to get bigger, but to get better. We believe strongly that the additions of Georgia State and Texas, now, have made the Sun Belt a better conference for the future.”
Realignment challenges: “The addition of Georgia State and Texas State — while both were done in a strategic matter hoping that North Texas and Florida International would remain in the Sun Belt, should the speculation and what’s expected out there be true – these two universities are outstanding additions, despite, perhaps, the loss of Florida International and North Texas. As far as further challenges, with making some assumptions that if we were to lose two current member and replaced by Georgia State and Texas State, that gets us back to 10 football universities along with Arkansas-Little Rock as a non-football member.
“Our goal would be to get to 12 members to be able to divide into divisions and to be able to create some geographic efficiency with the membership in the West versus the membership in East. One of the advantages and one of the assets of the Sun Belt is that we are located in the state of Texas. I think it was important we remain in the state of Texas, Texas State certainly does that regardless of what happens with the University of North Texas. And Florida – with Florida Atlantic remaining there, we continue our Texas-Florida geography and demographics in those two important states. At some point in time, and it’ll be sooner than later, that we address our next member after, again, even though some of these have moved fast, they’ve moved with a plan in place. Right now the plan is ongoing.”
Hanging FAU: “We recognized the possibility that that would exist. We will look at future members in the Sun Belt footprint. I’m sure that there is a wide array of football-playing members, or non-football playing members that are either in Florida, or the surrounding states that may give some memberships assitance to Florida Atlantic.”
UT-Arlington: “I think, once again, what that demonstrates is just how much misinformation can be out there and has been out there. We have had conversations with UT-Arlington and we’ll continue to do so. But there is nothing imminent in terms of any decision regarding UT-Arlington.”
Moving outside footprint: “We’ll evaluate future members based on quality of the university and the overall academic characteristics along with the athletics like we have with Georgia State and Texas State. Secured two outstanding universities and I’m confident that there will be others and if they happen to fall within the Sun Belt footprint, that would be ideal, but I don’t think we’d rule out someone. The Sun Belt footprint from Texas to Florida is pretty expansive.”
FCS candidates:“I think it starts at the very top with the president, chancellor, CEO of the university. What we’ve seen with both Georgia State and Texas State is that there is strong presidential leadership and commitment. The two athletic directors at the respective universities have had a plan in place, and it isn’t something just happened to occur out of any type of sense of urgency, both Georgia State and Texas State had four or five year plans in terms of their move to FBS. Texas State has invested tremendous resources in getting their football program ready. An expanded stadium, an expanded pressbox and suite area that is fantastic. They’re enclosing the north end zone of the stadium as we speak. Texas State will have one of the top football complexes in the Sun Belt.”
Looking at ‘football’ states: “I think that’s big part of it, the states are important, and the other thing is both universities have invested in coaches that have been established. Bill Curry at Georgia State and Dennis Franchione at Texas State. Those two coaches have coached at the FBS level, have been successful at the FBS level and they now are building their respective football programs. I truly believe that Texas State or Georgia State, or both, will soon be a top-20 type football program.”
Idaho, New Mexico State: “Right now I think it’s premature to talk about either Idaho or New Mexico State in terms of where they might fit. Until we know for sure what the end result is for the Sun Belt and what our membership will be comprised of on July 1, 2013, with the addition of Georgia State and Texas State, probably have not given a lot of attention or time looking West right now. We certainly understand the issues that are in front of New Mexico State and Idaho and we’ll, at some point in time, have conversation with them about what their future may be. But at this juncture, it’s way too soon to speculate.”
Conference realignment: “I think there’s still a couple moves that may be made that will keep it alive. I think all of us, for sure, are hoping that it comes to a stop as soon as possible, so that their can be some stability. But when you think about it, since 1990, there have been a couple of periods where there have been four or five year stability where there hasn’t been any membership change. If Butler were to leave the Horizon league, I think there will have been 25 out of 31 conferences that have had some type of membership change in the last five years. So this five-year period has been clearly the most volatile. I guess I would hope that because of the volatility that has existed the last five, that perhaps the next five can be a little calmer.”
FBS options: “One of my early comments about Sun Belt expansion is that we would evaluate both FBS and FCS within the Sun Belt footprint. You may be right that the number of FCS programs within the footprint may not be available. So we may have to look outside the Sun Belt footprint for other FBS programs. We have had been contacted by several FCS programs within the Sun Belt footprint. Those schools will be evaluated in a larger total assesment of where we go from here and how we round this out.
“The message that I made today here in San Marcos and have made fairly consistently is that regardless of how this plays out, the Sun Belt has had options, we’ve exercised some of those options with Georgia State and Texas State and thus far I think that we have taken advantage of some of this uncertainty. As we then we go to the final file spot, and that’s either to go to 12 overall or to get to 12 football-playing schools that would allow for the championship, we’ll continue to have options and choices both on the FBS and the FCS level.”
TV Deal: “It was just renegotiated a year ago and it goes out eight years. Now, however, assuming that there are departures from the Sun Belt, it does trigger a regotiation and we are expecting that there will be renegotiation of the existing contract and believe that we can make a strong case that as we reconfigure the Sun Belt, that we will be a more valuable property than what was assessed a year ago.”